Sunday, June 19, 2016

Oakfield to be sold for Housing, new secondary school and a health centre

  • Barkingside to accommodate 1,407 new homes
  • 600 new homes on Oakfield
  • Green Belt to be concreted over
  • Barkingside community hub to be relocated in Hainault on site subject to flooding
  • Plans “whipped” through
Welcome to the Redbridge Local Development Plan.

The first thing to note about the Redbridge Local Development Plan 2015-2030 is that we are now already 14 months in, and Redbridge Council have not yet agreed it, let alone anyone else, like the Planning Inspectorate, the London Mayor, or the Secretary of State.
This never-ending story arose well in time for the “start” of the plan back in 2013, but has been delayed time and time again due to cold feet on the part of our elected representatives, on both sides, not wishing to jeopardise their electoral performance at consecutive elections in 2014, 2015 and 2016.

Assuming the plan, as it is now, is agreed by Full Council on 21st July, as we expect it to be, then it will undergo further public examination by the Planning Inspector before a recommendation is made to the London Mayor and the Secretary of State. By the time this happens the earliest the plan can be adopted will be almost 2 years late.

The Impact of Delay

The result of sitting on the report for 2 years is that it is now being rushed through to meet the 2017 deadline, otherwise it can be taken out of the council’s hands and imposed by central government. This leaves a mere 6-8 weeks during the peak holiday season for the public consultation, which is timed to be concluded in September.

The other impact is that it has allowed the council to increase the target for new homes well above that required by the London Plan (16,845), using a different target of “Redbridge Capacity” (18,774) and citing the classically named “objective assessment of housing need” which is even higher (32,000).

Windfall

The target includes a “windfall allowance” of 4,050 to account for development sites that arise unexpectedly. However in the latest edition of the plan the council has declined to use the whole allowance preferring a lower figure of 2,700. So, new housing on identified sites for development has increased from 12,795 to 16,074.

The Breakdown

Here is a table of the numbers for each investment area as they stood in the previous and current editions:

Investment Area 
June 2015
(previous)
May 2016
(current)
Ilford Town Centre 
4,484
5,915
Crossrail Corridor
2,669
4,987
Gants Hill
621
487
South Woodford
427
651
Barkingside
1,005
1,407
Outside Investment Areas    
2,666
2,627
TOTALS
11,872
16,074

It should be noted that:

a) the Crossrail Corridor includes the King George and Goodmayes Hospital sites, Ford Sports ground and Seven Kings Park, plus now in the latest edition, green belt land at Billet Road.

b) South Woodford includes the Redbridge Recreation ground and other Green Belt land between Beal School and the River Roding.




In partnership with
Barkingside 21
Invite you to a
Public Campaign Meeting
The Next Stage
Monday 11th July 2016 at 7:30pm
Jack Carter Pavilion, Oakfield site

Contact: saveoakfieldsociety@gmail.com             

The Increased Numbers

As you may recall in late 2013 the then Cabinet member sent the report back to officers for alternatives to the Oakfield site. All 3 alternatives, as well as Oakfield, are now included in the new plan.

Neighbourhoods “Whipped”

It was clear from the debate at the Neighbourhoods Service committee on 26th May that whatever other new sites are included in the plan, and whatever windfall sites arise, (however much the new total increases), Oakfield will remain an “option” in the plan, unless the council are over-ruled by the Planning Inspector, the London Mayor or the Secretary of State.



Location, Location, Location

Planning rules state that if a local authority relocates a sports club or playing fields they must be of equal or better quality and accessible.

The proposed location of the Oakfield clubs and facilities is the Hainault recreation ground, which according to the very same report is subject to flooding by Seven Kings Water.

Barkingside

The planned total of new homes to be provided in the Barkingside investment area has increased to 1,407 (1,005), 600 of which are earmarked for Oakfield as well as a secondary school and a health centre. It also includes 200 on the current playing pitches in between King Solomon and Avanti schools and behind Heybridge Drive.

Other sites listed in Appendix 1 include New Mossford School (212), Craven Gardens Car Park (55), Queen Victoria House (37), Gala Bingo (55), Fullwell Cross Health Centre (55), Station Approach (41) plus various other single figure sites including, curiously, a site in Longbridge Road, Barking.

Green Belt

Oakfield is not the only parcel of current Green Belt to be included in the plan for development. There is also the Ford Sports Ground, Seven Kings Park, the whole of the King George and Goodmayes hospital sites plus land at Billet Road and land by Beal School, not to mention Redbridge Recreation Ground (which is not GB).

Who’s Next?

If the “housing crisis” can over-ride and push established clubs and quality playing pitches to other locations, then look out Wanstead Rugby Club, Ashton Playing Fields, Caterham Playing Field, Barkingside Rec., Eton Manor Rugby Club, allotments et al, except, of course, the derelict and underused Goodmayes Park Extension.

Doublespeak

Some Gems from the wordy parts of the report:

1.1.5 While facilitating major change, this Local Plan will also safeguard and enhance what is good and special about Redbridge – Oakfield is not good or special?

1.3.1 Communities can now influence the future of their local areas by preparing a neighbourhood plan that sets out their vision for the area and general planning policies to guide development.

BUT!
Neighbourhood plans must be ‘pro-development’. They are about guiding and shaping development, not undermining the delivery of development in that area.

1.14.19 The borough has an enviable leisure offer. There are a range of sports and leisure facilities in the borough including … Oakfield not mentioned.

1.16.3 Reducing obesity is a priority for Redbridge,

1.17.4 Population growth coupled with the increased demand for travel has put severe pressure on the local transport system. Traffic congestion has increased and contributes greatly to the borough’s carbon emissions, resulting in adverse impacts on air quality and quality of life for residents.

The Council aims to maximise the diversity and potential of the borough’s community’s assets, to create places that promote health and well-being for all.

LP34 The Council will protect designated Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land, as defined on the Policies Map, for the purposes of:
(a) Safeguarding the countryside from encroachment;
(b) Checking the unrestricted sprawl of Greater London;
(c) Preventing the merging of: Woodford Green with Woodford Bridge, Wanstead with Ilford and Aldersbrook and Barkingside with Hainault; precisely what Oakfield does.

Conclusion

This plan represents a political decision. It has been made by, for and in Redbridge. The increased figures have not been imposed from outside or higher up.

This is a council who want to build, build, build their way out of a housing crisis that is not of their making and can only be solved by addressing the fundamental inequalities in the housing market over which they have no control.

As John Prescott famously said: “the Green Belt is a Labour achievement, and we are going to build on it!”

Attend the meeting or sign up for campaign updates.

13 comments:

  1. And these bastards are listening to residents?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's over a hundred million reasons for that.

      Delete
  2. My dread is that flood plain on the Elmbridge road site includes run off water from a cemetery maybe two ....yucky

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wander if the Euro referendum is going to make any difference?

    ReplyDelete
  4. And I would like to know who is going to be able to afford these properties by the time they are going to be on sale... No one can get a Morgage now let alone when they are finished so I would be cautious as they will all be privately rented or the council will have to buy them or a polish etc banks will be giving out mortgages to all its ex countrymen now living here

    ReplyDelete
  5. How are we to combat the childhood obesity crisis if playing fields are built over? the one between the two schools is used extensively at present.

    ReplyDelete
  6. How many homes in SOuth Ilford? Home many in Woodford? Wanstead?

    Where are all the Gps, Dentists going to go?
    And A and E at King Goerge will still shut?
    Seven Kings Park? That's new? Seven Kings is an area which is short of green space. The council's own assessments show this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The "galactic centre" of this LDP, the core around which all else revolves and the reason why anything at all needs to be "released" and "re-provisioned" hither and thither is in:

    Appendix 2 | Infrastructure Delivery Plan Schedule of Projects

    on Page 170 under "Education"

    "Addition 54 Forms of
    Entry (FE) through
    extensions and new
    provisions (equivalent
    to 6-7 secondary
    schools based on
    average secondary
    school size of 8 FE)"

    Future growth Costs
    2016-2030

    £222,693,300.00

    Yes, that's £223 MILLION

    Notwithstanding that it's a lot a money, who has come up with these numbers and where does the Council propose to find the land on which to build "6-7 secondary schools"?

    ReplyDelete
  8. We're doomed ...doomed I tell ya !

    ReplyDelete
  9. Well done for your campaigning. I have attended several Council meetings over this to realise that our counsellors are not interested in what us voters have to say. However, no mention or consideration seems to have been given to the fact that Hainault has already had an increase in housing as new houses have been constructed at the end of New North Rd. We are also being faced with a development at Oaklands Hamlets, Five Oaks Lane which will consist of 2 and 5 Bedroom houses. We also have 182 homes being built by Taylor Wimpey at New North Square on the old Kelvin Hughes Site.
    Have any of our counsellors or MP's bothered to look around the area they intend to build on. It is one long traffic jam. With out even going into the pollution it is all causing.

    Good Luck

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hate to say it ,,,but if they build it people will " buy it" would not go near a new build personally but people do and the purchasers are not bothered about the impact on local areas...so it is for our counsellors to stop these new developments but as I have said before they normally have a personal interest somehow ....it busines.s that rely on lots of new consumers ...I gave up a long time ago on putting my opinion forward to the council cos they don't care ...

    ReplyDelete
  11. They sit and wait for the dynamics of the area to change and then they pounce....the seeds have been sown a long time ago for this one ...and as those who care depart however that may be, the area for good, the foundations will be laid...and the newcomers will never know the way it was.....then let them have the chaos ...it will come back to them in one way or another....I have been lucky to bring up my children who are now both in thier early twenties in a once beautiful area that is being ruined by people who don't even live in Redbridge making the judgements and imposing this madness on us ....how sad! ,but well done mr b,side 21.... They ain't listening they never do all too busy looking after themselves and alike themselves....ps....I will never ever ever buy a new build.....

    ReplyDelete
  12. Would it make it better...if all the homes built were to be part rent part buy.....that way people would be striving to pay a morgage and less would be rented to others ...like most new builds end up ....and people would make them a long term home rather than a business....just wandered if it would make the prospect of something that is inevitable anyway easier to chew ?

    ReplyDelete