Albert Einstein: “Setting an example is not the main means of influencing another, it is the only means.”I have today written, in my personal capacity, to the Group Leaders of the 3 main political parties here in Redbridge, copied to Deputy Leaders, Cabinet Members, my local ward councillors and the Chief Executive and blind copied to a few others one of whom objects, see later.
Dear Group Leaders,Douglass responds:
Animal Aid has produced a Compassionate Charter to help councils adopt an ethical policy that will help animals, people and the planet. The full charter can be viewed here. click!
The main points are eight practical and achievable goals. They are:
purchasing only cruelty-free cleaning products and toiletries;
banning circuses with animals from council land;
banning pets as prizes;
promoting and subsidising spaying and neutering programmes;
stopping the sale of foie gras and veal;
speaking out against fur;
adopting only the humane, non-lethal management of pigeons and other animals and birds;
and making their towns a plastic bag-free zone.
I hope this is something that Redbridge Council can support as it would be a positive, ethical statement to make. I trust this can be considered in due process.
Yours etc
The thing is that I as an individual, as well as Douglass, have the right to voice an opinion and attempt to influence the way my taxes are spent, nationally and locally. And so do you.As a council tax payer, I strongly object to Redbridge Council having anything to do with this charter, for the following reasons:
1 The basic propositions are tendentious and open to a great deal of personal agreement or disagreement
2 It is no business whatsoever of local authorities to define or impose ethics
3 It is most emphatically the business of local authorities to spend as little of taxpayers' money as possible, not embark on irrelevant programmes to gratify pressure groups
4 This includes most particularly the matter of dealing with vermin in direct and cost-effective ways
5 I resent the suggestion that councillors and officers should waste time and resources paid for by me on matters which are none of the council's business
None of this has anything to do with my own views on animal welfare - which in many ways are probably quite well aligned with Alan's. But it has everything to do with the proper functions of local government
I therefore urge the addressees to ignore this mischievous charter
Regards etc
As for lobby groups, if you are a member of the Ramblers, National Trust, RSPB, Friends of the Earth WWF, CPRE, LWT, etc etc etc or for that matter B21 you are a lobby group. But do you have as much influence as the parliamentary lobby groups promoting the Tobacco Industry, Road Haulage, Nuclear Energy, Coal, Climate Change, LGBT issue etc etc?
We now have the Sustainable Communities Act, which allows individuals and groups the opportunity to put forward proposals to their local authority, although here in Redbridge we are not quite up to speed.
If, as Douglass says, his views on animal welfare are in many ways probably quite well aligned with mine, then why should those views not be fed into government in a bottom-up mode of influence? Isn’t that how government should work?
Would it not be bizarre for us the community to live by one set of ethical standards while our elected representative’s practice another?
Discuss, or put your views to your councillors or both.
Come, come, my boys, with a hearty glee,


























