I’ve only just picked this up. A couple of weeks ago on Friday 20th March there was a debate in Parliament on the Fuel Poverty Bill. The Labour government lead by their “Energy Minister” Mrs Joan Ruddock talked out the bill. That is, they deliberately waffled on until time ran out and a vote could not be taken. After 4 hours of debate Mrs Ruddock was charming The House with her rhetoric when the bell rang. The Fuel Poverty Bill, backed by campaigning groups including Age Concern, Help the Aged and Child Poverty Action Group would have introduced:
* A major energy efficiency programme to bring existing homes up to the energy efficiency standards of modern houses, cutting fuel poverty
* 'Social tariffs' to protect vulnerable people like pensioners from high energy bills
Mrs Ruddock is MP for Lewisham Deptford and the man hoping to put her out of a job at the next general election, local councillor Darren Johnson, said: "Instead of allowing an honest vote by MPs, Joan Ruddock chose underhand tactics to avoid a democratic decision on these important proposals. This sabotage, and her earlier support for Heathrow expansion, is making a mockery of her job as energy and climate change minister."
His colleague, Councillor Luxton said: "This bill would have protected millions from the terrible choice between heating and eating, which too many pensioners and other vulnerable people have to make. Many will feel let down by the underhand way in which it was defeated."
Now then, The Association for the Conservation of Energy estimates that in the Ilford North constituency, of which Barkingside is part, there are 5,170 elderly people who live in one room during the winter months to save money on heating their home, 3,878 stay in bed to keep warm, and 1,551 have to make the choice between heating their home or eating properly.
What surprised me is that these figures [and I’m aware they may not be accurate] are higher than those for the constituency of Ilford South, 4,700, 3,150 and 1,260 respectively, whom we are constantly told are the “poor relations” of the borough of Redbridge. Poverty takes many forms, and being Capital rich doesn’t do any good if you are on a fixed income and cannot service your day to day needs.
It is interesting to note that the Ilford North MP signed the Early Day Motion that welcomed the introduction of the bill to The House but the Ilford South MP did not. The MP for Leyton and Wanstead also did not sign that EDM but he has the excuse of being busy filling out his expenses claims. The other Redbridge MP, Chingford and Woodford Green, rarely signs EDMs.


































